Template
Heritage Statement Template , Sample Sections and Wording (2026)
Reviewed by
Oliver Wakefield-Smith
Founder, Digital Signet
Last reviewed 22 June 2026 · Refreshed quarterly
Direct answer
What sections does a Heritage Statement need?
A Statement of Heritage Significance follows HEAN 12 and contains five sections: introduction and methodology, identification of the asset and its setting, statement of significance, description of the proposal, and assessment of impact with mitigation. For a one-page Heritage Statement these collapse into a single flowing narrative; for a fuller statement they become explicit headings.
One-page template structure
- Paragraph 1. Asset identity (address, list entry number, grade, listing date), works proposed, applicant.
- Paragraph 2. Significance , what makes the asset important, in 80 to 120 words, walking the four heritage values.
- Paragraph 3. The proposal , what is changing, where, in what materials.
- Paragraph 4. Impact and mitigation , locate the harm on the less-than-substantial spectrum and identify the mitigation that brings it down.
- Paragraph 5. Public benefit and conclusion , why the LPA should consent under NPPF ¶208.
Sample wording , significance paragraph
The property is a Grade II listed early-19th-century townhouse in a London Brick Italianate group. Its principal significance is aesthetic , the survival of an unbroken stucco-fronted terrace contributing positively to the conservation area's character , and historical, as an illustrative example of speculative residential development in the 1820s. The principal-elevation fenestration, the railings and the front door retain original or historically-correct fabric.
Sample wording , impact and mitigation paragraph
The proposed rear extension affects the rear elevation only, removes one 20th-century replacement window of no special interest, and is set behind the existing rear-projection ridge line so as not to be visible from the public realm. The harm to the significance of the asset is located at the lower end of the less-than-substantial spectrum under NPPF ¶208. Mitigation is achieved by use of lime mortar, brick selected to match the existing rear stock, and reinstatement of a historically-correct timber sash to the affected opening.
What to avoid
- Restating the listing description without going beyond it.
- Boilerplate about 'preserving historic character' without identifying what character.
- Failure to locate the harm on the spectrum.
- Failure to identify any public benefit, however modest.